Skip to content

User ResearchOpsGet started today

User research at the speed of AI.

The release is approaching, but the research queue is full. Prepare a synthetic study grounded in your research and behavioral data, compare designs, and bring the findings into your next real-user study.

15,000+User studies run on Sentia
10×More research studies per monthReported by a design leader at a global technology firm.
Research workspace

Nike checkout redesign

Study brief

What would you like to learn?

Start with a question. Sentient brings your research into the study.

Compare our new guest checkout with the current Nike experience. Use our customer research to build an audience and find what helps shoppers finish their purchase.

  • research-study.pdfPDF · 240 kB
  • research.csvCSV · 32 kB
  • checkout-events.csvCSV · 96 kB
3 sources attached
1 / 3 · Prepare the study

What our customers are saying.

Sentia is trusted by UX researchers at

Bring evidence to the decision before the deadline.

When the release cannot wait for the next research slot, get an early read on where users may struggle. Use it to improve the experience and focus the questions you bring to real-user studies.

Reuse the work behind the study.

Carry research context into the brief and audience instead of starting from a blank page.

Find friction before release.

Examine a prototype or live experience while your team still has time to act.

Bring evidence to the decision.

Connect recommendations to the observations and screens that support them.

01 / First-party grounding

Ground simulations in your first-party data.

Generic personas miss what makes your customers different. Ground the simulated audience in your own research and behavior data, so the study starts from what you know about real users.

Research workspace

Connected sources

4 connected
Google Drive12 documents

Shopper interviews and checkout research.

Available in your research context
02 / World knowledge graph

Keep each finding in context.

An observation means little without the task and audience behind it. Inspect the relationships and sources behind a result before deciding how broadly it applies.

Research workspace

World knowledge graph

CheckoutProduct area

Delivery cost uncertainty appears in 23 of 100 synthetic walkthroughs.

Connected evidenceAmplitudeGoogle Drive
03 / Audience and observation

Screen the flow before recruiting a study.

Watch a research-grounded synthetic audience attempt the product tasks. Use the observed friction to sharpen the questions you take to real participants.

Audience composition

US online footwear shoppers

100Synthetic participants
Demographics
Ages 18–54 · All gendersStudents and working professionals
Geographics
United StatesUrban and suburban shoppers
Psychographics
Style, comfort, and valueBrand loyalists and comparison shoppers
Behaviors
Mobile browsing · Guest checkoutDelivery checks and cart abandonment

Behavioral grounding

Interview findings, survey responses, and checkout events inform each persona.

research-study.pdfPDF · 240 kB
research.csvCSV · 32 kB
checkout-events.csvCSV · 96 kB
04 / Evidence and decisions

Know what to investigate next.

A report should leave your team with a next step. Review the observed friction beside the affected screens, then decide what to change and what to validate with real customers.

Checkout redesign Completed
Website comparison · 100 synthetic participants

Guest checkout wins preference. Delivery clarity still needs work.

68 of 100 synthetic shoppers preferred the new checkout. A clearer guest path helped more participants finish, but delivery timing remained a source of hesitation.

68%Prefer new checkout
81/100SUS score
86%Completed the new flow

Choice distribution

New checkout received 68% of choices across 100 simulated agents. Current checkout followed at 32%.

Choice distribution. New checkout: 68%, Current checkout: 32%

Task completion

72%Current checkout
86%New checkout

Key findings

1
Make guest checkout the obvious path.

Shoppers can continue without deciding whether to create an account.

68 of 100 preferred the new checkout
2
Show the arrival date before payment.

Participants still look for a delivery estimate before committing to the order.

23 of 100 asked about delivery timing

Product illustrations show example research, not Nike customer results.

Sentia MCP

Take Sentia wherever you build.

Run studies and test local prototypes from your terminal with the Sentia MCP. Bring your research-grounded audiences into Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex and get usability feedback where you work.

~/researchTerminal
~/research $ claude
Sentia MCP · Connected
Run a usability study on my local checkout prototype.
Prototype study workflow

01Capture the local checkout flow.

02Use the audience grounded in customer research.

03Run the study and return usability findings.

Grounded in 2 linked sources
Local checkout prototype Read Audience context Read
Claude CodeCursorCodex

What could your team do with the time back?

Model the capacity you could free for research. Adjust these example inputs to reflect your team and the workflow you want to evaluate.

576Hours freed per year
$43,200Annual capacity value
+6Studies per month at the same capacity

Illustrative inputs, not measured customer results. Hours freed equal the difference in team hours per study multiplied by your annual study volume. Capacity value applies your hourly cost; it is not cash savings and excludes Sentia fees. Additional studies assume comparable scope and that all freed hours are reused for research.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Anything else, write to us: hello@sentialabs.ai

Let’s talk

Bring your next research question.

Show us the product question you need to answer. We’ll explore how a research-grounded study could help your team decide what to change next.

Optional

We’ll email you to discuss your request. Privacy · Security