Start here
AI for enterprise DesignOps: start with the operational bottleneck
Where should a design organization start with AI? Choose one operational bottleneck and measure whether the work actually gets easier.
Read the article
Sentia Blog
The operating playbook for design leaders.
Staff the priorities, resolve review bottlenecks, and make design’s contribution visible. Practical workflows and research for design leaders and UX research leaders.
Latest writing
- Perspectives
How to measure design impact beyond files and ticket counts
Files and ticket counts miss much of design’s contribution. Build a more useful picture of impact without claiming causation your data cannot establish.
- Perspectives
Design team capacity planning: close staffing gaps before the quarter slips
Priority work can be understaffed even when every designer is busy. See the gap and make a staffing decision within your existing budget.
- Perspectives
Bring contribution evidence into design calibration
Calibration should not depend on who remembers the quarter best. Build a contribution record that helps managers assess the work fairly.
- Research notes
AI design adoption: measure review delays and rework, too
More AI-generated designs do not necessarily mean faster delivery. Find out whether adoption reduces the review delays and rework that slow your team.
- Perspectives
What is DesignOps? Design operations for enterprise design teams
DesignOps (design operations) runs the repeatable systems around design work. Learn what enterprise DesignOps owns, when you need it, and how it differs from ResearchOps.
- How-to
How to evaluate a synthetic user research platform
Test a synthetic research platform against a decision you actually face. Ten checks to distinguish useful evidence from a convincing demo.
- How-to
Run a design business review that supports an investment decision
Turn the quarterly design review into a decision about where to invest next. A practical structure for making the case with your own operating data.
- Perspectives
Synthetic users vs usability testing vs interviews: choose by risk
Choose the research method that fits the decision and its risk. Learn where synthetic studies help and when direct research with real people is essential.
- Perspectives
What is synthetic user research, and when should you use it?
Understand how AI-simulated audiences can help teams test design options earlier, and which questions still require research with real people.
- Perspectives
Get research evidence to the team before the decision deadline
Research loses value when it arrives after the decision. Reshape study intake around the deadline and risk so teams get useful evidence in time.
- How-to
Staff research against decision volume and risk
Build a research staffing case around the decisions your organization needs to make, rather than treating a designer-to-researcher ratio as a target.
- Perspectives
Design performance reviews: prepare them without rebuilding the quarter
Review season should not start with a search through months of files. Keep contributions legible throughout the quarter and leave assessment with the manager.
- How-to
Connect design decisions to business outcomes with evidence
Show how a design decision contributed to a shipped outcome, with a record that leaders can inspect and use in the next investment discussion.
- Research notes
Synthetic respondents: what the research benchmarks do and do not validate
Published benchmarks can validate a method without validating a product. Learn what the results establish and how to test a platform against your own outcomes.
- How-to
Ground synthetic user panels in customer evidence you can inspect
Generic personas weaken synthetic research. Learn how first-party customer evidence makes an audience more representative and its grounding easier to inspect.